• Home
  • School Leader Coaching
    • Emotional Intelligence
  • School Startup
    • Feasibility Study
    • Curriculum Development
    • International Baccalaureate Programmes
  • School Leadership
    • School Leader Training
    • Governance
  • School Improvement
    • Team Building
    • Strategic Planning
    • International Baccalaureate
  • About Us
    • About Daniel Hollinger
    • Associate Consultants
    • In the News
  • Projects
  • Articles
  • Archive
  • Contact Us

Hollinger International | School Consultant | Starting a School | Private School Management

Hollinger International provides tailored, strategic assistance to clients starting a school. An experienced school consultant who will work with you to establish your school, improve your education programs and help you with private school management.

School Consulting and Leadership Coaching
RSSTwitterFacebookLinkedin

International Baccalaureate Inquiry-Based Education Helps Students Excel

August 30, 2010 by J Daniel Hollinger Leave a Comment

Inquiry-based education is grounded in the belief that we learn by inquiring and constructing meaning, that content is very important and that it is inadequate to focus primarily on teaching skills and traditional tests as measures of learning. To help students thrive academically and socially, learning must go beyond skill acquisition and memorization to high order thinking skills and the mastery of content that provides students with the ability to apply what they learn to new situations, solve problems and create new ideas. This depth of understanding and intellectual capacity leads to a love of learning, an ability to develop innovative solutions to problems and the capacity to create new knowledge.

The International Baccalaureate Primary Years Programme (PYP), Middle Years Programme (MYP) and Diploma Programme (DP) offer the best approach to inquiry-based education. The PYP, MYP and DP are based upon comprehensive research and extensive, wide-ranging experience – excellent practice derived from a variety of national systems and schools. They provide a framework to guide coherent content instruction from grade to grade, encouraging steady academic, social and intellectual progress as students expand their intellectual and social capacities, knowledge and skills. Teachers plan activities, engage students in learning and asses their progress, and then reformulate the plan according to the results.

The PYP and MYP are curriculum frameworks, whereas the DP is a prescribed curriculum. There are important reasons for this difference. Each programme is designed to meet the developmental needs of students of particular ages and at key stages of identity formation.Schools need room to shape the curriculum according to local requirements and to their cultural realities and priorities. The DP has to provide students with the qualifications to gain entry to universities anywhere in the world, hence the increased level of prescription in the programme.

The PYP and MYP are coherent and comprehensive programmes that allow schools, through collaborative teams of teachers, to develop their own content-content that is relevant to the cultural context of the school. The framework offers some degree of flexibility, allowing schools o incorporate local or national curriculum requirements if necessary. Student learning is assessed internally by teachers and, in the MYP, teachers’ assessment can be externally moderated by the IB in order to meet recognized global standards. The DP is, equally, a coherent and comprehensive programme but the curriculum and assessment procedures are prescribed in more detail in order to meet the requirements for university entrance around the world. Student learning in the DP is assessed largely by external examinations set by the IB.

The PYP and MYP are inclusive programmes with the flexibility to meet the needs of all students. The DP is not exclusive but, because it is aimed at providing students with all they need to be successful in higher education, the full IB Diploma Programme may not be the best fit for all students. The PYP and MYP use different structures and approaches from the DP in order to meet the intellectual and developmental needs of students in the relevant age groups, but they prepare students both intellectually and personally to be successful in the DP. While there is a common, strong philosophy underpinning the three programmes, each programme has distinct characteristics that are appropriate to the age level for which it was designed.

Filed Under: Inquiry-Based Education, International Baccalaureate

Arabic and Chinese: Supply and Demand

August 16, 2010 by J Daniel Hollinger Leave a Comment


The demand for K-12 international educational programs that include language training is increasing dramatically in the United States. Arabic, in particular, is experiencing dramatic growth. Designated a “strategic” language by the U.S. government, Arabic faces unprecedented demand for instruction in schools across the U.S., from kindergarten upwards. Not long ago, Middle Eastern languages comprised only 2 percent of all foreign language classes in the United States. A Modern Language Association survey revealed a 92 percent rise in Arabic enrollments between 1998 and 2002 — to 10,600. From 2002-2006, the number of students enrolled in Arabic courses in college increased from 10,584 students to 23,974 students—a 126.5% jump.

The U.S. Department of Education has responded to meet the demand for new Arabic education. Federal funds for various international education programs are up 33 percent since 2001 to $103.7 million in 2004. Specifically, grants for foreign language and area studies rose 65 percent during this period. A myriad federally-funded opportunities are available for students and educators to learn Arabic in the United States. The U.S. government is also encouraging schools to start language training sooner. “We’re living in a global society,” said Wilbert Bryant, deputy assistant secretary for higher education in the U.S. Department of Education. “We must be able to speak the languages of many countries. The only way is to start at K-12. It’s the only way to remain competitive and retain our position as the superpower in the world.”

In addition to Arabic, the rise of China is driving new demand for Chinese language speakers across business and social sectors. Yet schools throughout the United States are largely unprepared to meet this need, lacking qualified teachers, programs, or creative uses of modern educational technologies, according to a study by Asia Society. The report, entitled “Expanding Chinese Language Capacity in the United States,” calls for a national commitment to new investments in teaching Chinese language and culture. Created by Asia Society’s education division, the report documents a growing consensus among national security and business leaders, educators, and foreign language experts. Its analysis of the current status of Chinese language instruction concludes that the current infrastructure to support recruitment of students and teachers as well as the growth of high quality programs is woefully inadequate.

As China grows into a major world player, Chinese language skills are becoming critical to national prosperity and security. Yet, a recent study shows only 24,000 students in grades 7-12 study Chinese, a language spoken by 1.3 billion people. In contrast, more than one million students learn French, a language spoken by only 80 million people. “Our nation’s schools are locked in a time warp. By ignoring critical languages such as Chinese and the essential cultural knowledge needed to succeed, our school systems are out of step with new global realities. This report urgently highlights the need for an expanded national commitment to world languages and international studies,” said Charles Kolb, President of the Committee for Economic Development.

Filed Under: Language Immersion

Peace Education

February 1, 2010 by J Daniel Hollinger Leave a Comment

Life around the globe is filled with violence manifested in social inequalities, exclusion and armed conflict. Today, more than ever, we need to teach peace and create opportunities for students to explore nonviolent ways to resolve interpersonal, local and global conflicts. Peace and conflict resolution is probably the most valuable “discipline” in education, yet schools rarely include it in their curriculum in any significant way. Instead, we glamorize war and teach our children and youth to idolize war heroes. Imagine, for a moment, the power of focusing on peacemakers, peace, and the conditions for peace among peoples, between nations and in our personal lives.

In my view, all schools should be required to teach peace and conflict resolution to all students at all grade levels. Peace and conflict resolution must have a seat at the curriculum table to achieve lasting peace in our world. Peace education is dramatically more valuable and important than many courses students are required to take in school. Did you know that high school students forget about 85% of what they learn, due in large part to the fact that many required courses are totally irrelevant to their lives and interests? They sit for hours in boring classes, sleep or listen to boring lectures, read textbooks, take notes, cram for tests and promptly dump the data from their brains after the tests. I believe nearly everyone is interested in getting along well and peacefully with others. If peace education and conflict resolution at interpersonal, local, national and global levels played a significant role in education globally, our world would be far more peaceful and prosperous for all. Organizations such as Peace Education Center, http://www.tc.edu/peaceed of Teachers College at Columbia University are certainly doing their part to move us forward.

Filed Under: Peace Education Tagged With: danny hollinger, j daniel hollinger

Educating vs Stuffing Students

December 4, 2009 by J Daniel Hollinger Leave a Comment

Most reasonable people agree that education must prepare students for the global community of the 21st century. Yet nearly all high school students are being educated today as though we are still living in the industrial age. As Paul Saffo points out, “The model to replace industrial age education isn’t clear yet. But the idea that a person stands in front of the room stuffing information into learners like grain into a duck is changing to the idea that teaching is about being a wise companion and advisor.” Approximately 85% of the information that is stuffed into our high school students is forgotten after the students regurgitate it for quizzes and tests. It’s not a pretty scene.

Students learn and remember what they learn when teaching, learning and curricula are inquiry-based and authentic—relevant to the “real” world, and transdisciplinary—integrated and enriched across and by the disciplines or subject areas. Learning must go beyond memorization and skill acquisition to the mastery of content and “higher level” thinking that provides students with the ability to apply what they learn to new situations, solve problems, and create new ideas and knowledge. Memorizing facts and information is not the most important skill in today’s world. Facts change, and information is readily available. Humans of all ages construct understanding of the world though inquiry. Inquiry is not so much about finding the right answer, because often there is none, but rather seeking solutions to problems and understanding of issues.

Although the content of disciplines is important, learning content is a means to an end, not an end in itself. The knowledge within disciplines is constantly expanding and changing. It is impossible to learn everything, but everyone can develop inquiry skills and attitudes. Our arcane high school education system is a massive waste of time and resources. The mandatory feeding by teachers and regurgitation by students are reminiscent of the Roman excesses depicted in Fellini’s Roma.

Filed Under: Inquiry-Based Education, Testing Tagged With: inquiry based learning, Standardized Testing

Faculty Culture and Student Learning

October 19, 2009 by J Daniel Hollinger Leave a Comment

The nature of relationships among adults in schools is the single greatest determinant of students’ academic and social success. While subject-area knowledge and teaching skills are necessary, a school’s culture – especially faculty culture – creates the conditions for teaching and learning. Yet, sadly, faculty culture is typically characterized by departmentalization, turf wars and isolation.

As Roland Barth articulates so well, “All too often, the adult relationships are (in that wonderful phrase from preschool education) parallel play. For hours at a time, two- and three-year-olds in a sandbox can be so engrossed in themselves, in their own work and project and tools, that they are oblivious to anybody else in the sandbox. This is thought to be a stage of development through which two- and three-year-olds soon pass on their way to far more sophisticated forms of human interaction. But I’d say that parallel play characterizes most of what I see going on in schools.

The self-contained classroom is parallel play. The English department that doesn’t interact with the math department is parallel play. One school doing one thing, the school a mile down the road doing something different, oblivious to each other, is parallel play. Parallel play is endemic. It’s as if we have a case of professional arrested development. When adult relationships in schools are interactive, too often they are adversarial. As one teacher said, “You know we educators have drawn our wagons into a circle and trained our guns…on each other.” As if there aren’t enough people outside shooting at schools.”

Research clearly demonstrates that student learning correlates directly to adult learning. A faculty culture characterized by enthusiastic commitment to learning and personal growth, collaboration, and unremitting devotion to each and every student’s success is essential. In our schools, we need to elevate learning at all levels above all other concerns, activities and goals, and value dearly experimentation, new ideas, adventure and discovery. Teachers must teach teachers, observe each other, give constructive feedback, and collaborate across disciplines and languages. Learning is at its best in a school culture, created by adults and students, that values leaning above all else.

Filed Under: Faculty Culture, School Improvement Tagged With: adult learning, faculty culture, relationships, school culture, Student Learning, teaching

Hollinger International Consulting Services

February 10, 2009 by J Daniel Hollinger Leave a Comment

EDUCATION and LEADERSHIP DEVELOPMENT

Danny Hollinger of Hollinger International helps clients establish and improve schools and education programs, and strengthen education and nonprofit leadership.

Education

• School and Education Program Design, Start-Up and Improvement
• International Baccalaureate Programme Implementation and Authorization
• Language and Dual-Language Immersion Programs
• Inquiry-Based, Interdisciplinary and Trans-Disciplinary Curriculum, Teaching and Learning
• Student Performance Improvement
• Faculty Training and Professional Development

Leadership

• Leadership Development and Coaching
• Organizational and Faculty Culture Assessment and Improvement
• Collaborative Team Development
• Strategic Planning and Governance

Filed Under: Consulting Services Tagged With: board training, charter schools, daniel hollinger, danny hollinger, dual-language programs, education, education consulting, executive coaching, faculty culture, immersion programs, inquiry based curriculum, inquiry based learning, international baccalaureate, international baccalaureate programmes, international schools, j daniel hollinger, leadership development, leadership training, organizational culture, organizational development, primary schools, private schools, schools, secondary schools, strategic planning
  • « Previous
  • 1
  • …
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Search the site

Latest tweets

  • Check out my latest articles: http://t.co/ca46Zzms about 5 days ago
  • Going to Kaduna, Nigeria tomorrow to lead a school improvement project. about 6 days ago
  • Ask the Teachers http://t.co/gGP3aX2O via @HuffPostEdu about 10 days ago
  • http://t.co/7Yzvv2Xr about 10 days ago
  • NYTimes: My Mom Was My Roommate http://t.co/50YHESNk about 13 days ago
  • View my Twitter page

Copyright © 2012 Hollinger International
Return to top of page

Site designed by Petersen Media Group, LLC